Answers genesis radiometric dating

18-Jun-2019 04:26

Many geologists claim that radiometric “clocks” show rocks to be millions of years old.

However, to read any clock accurately we must know where the clock was set at the beginning.

Anyone can learn technical jargon (queue Wikipedia page for Potassium Argon Dating); reading this post only requires a knack for scientific reasoning.

Before I begin, there is one set of terms you should be able to distinguish: radiometric dating is a method of estimating the age of geological events using radioactive isotopes in minerals; radioactive dating occurs in the storage room at the nuclear power plant and has very little to do with geology.

Recently, much to my dismay, one of the home school teachers sent out a link to one of these videos on radiometric dating. As noted above, buried deep in this video and others that Answers in Genesis puts out is a particular philosophical bent that sees “observational science” as real science and “historical science” as not.

Aside from the mistakes inherent in the video, itself, it betrays a deep misunderstanding of how science works. Ken Ham is often quoted as rejecting historical science by rhetorically asking “Were you there?

There appears to be a fundamental conflict between the Bible and the reported ages given by radioisotope dating.

Since God is the Creator of all things (including science), and His Word is true (“), the true age of the earth must agree with His Word.

answers genesis radiometric dating-66answers genesis radiometric dating-14answers genesis radiometric dating-15

Though they are very tiny, polonium radiohalos have a huge message that cannot be ignored.

Over the years, Answers in Genesis has committed to undermining the credibility of radiometric dating techniques.

Their motivation is obvious: all techniques consistently yield age estimates far older than the purported So where to start?

Secondary to this notion that we can reconstruct the past is that the processes that occur today also occurred in the past.

If I am digging in a field and encounter, at a depth of three or so feet, a series of horizontal metal beams that are four and a half feet apart with ties in between them, because I know that distance is the standard railway gauge, I can reasonably assume that what I have uncovered is part of an old railway. No, but I didn’t have to be to have a pretty good idea of what it is.

Though they are very tiny, polonium radiohalos have a huge message that cannot be ignored.Over the years, Answers in Genesis has committed to undermining the credibility of radiometric dating techniques.Their motivation is obvious: all techniques consistently yield age estimates far older than the purported So where to start?Secondary to this notion that we can reconstruct the past is that the processes that occur today also occurred in the past.If I am digging in a field and encounter, at a depth of three or so feet, a series of horizontal metal beams that are four and a half feet apart with ties in between them, because I know that distance is the standard railway gauge, I can reasonably assume that what I have uncovered is part of an old railway. No, but I didn’t have to be to have a pretty good idea of what it is.When we look at sand in an hourglass, we can estimate how much time has passed based on the amount of sand that has fallen to the bottom.